Nigeria: Shell can improve impacts in the
Niger Delta - new report
Author: ECCR Press Release
Category: Resource Extraction
Date: 2/16/2010
Source: Ecumenical Council for Corporate
Responsibility
Source Website: www.eccr.org.uk
African Charter Article# 21: All peoples shall
freely dispose of their wealth and natural resources for their
exclusive interest, eliminating all forms of foreign economic
exploitation.
Summary & Comment: The report, Shell in the
Niger Delta: A Framework for Change, published by the Ecumenical
Council for Corporate Responsibility considers how the operations of
Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary, the Shell Petroleum Development Company
affect the human rights and living conditions of Niger Delta
communities. Its ten recommendations suggest immediate
confidence-building measures and longer-term ways to tackle some of the
challenges. With link to 88 page report. DN
Shell can improve impacts in the Niger Delta, says new report
Shell in the Niger Delta: A Framework for Change - five case
studies from civil society, published by ECCR, February 2010, 88
pp, is available at: www.eccr.org.uk/Sh
ellintheNigerDelta .
As Shell faces a lawsuit in the Netherlands over alleged oil
pollution in Nigeria, a new report published today argues that the oil
giant can and should take both prompt and longer-term action to reduce
the negative social and environmental impacts of its operations in the
Niger Delta. The report, Shell in the Niger Delta: A Framework for
Change, published by church-based investor coalition and
membership organisation the Ecumenical Council for Corporate
Responsibility (ECCR), considers how the operations of Shell’s
Nigerian subsidiary, the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC),
affect the human rights and living conditions of Niger Delta
communities.
Based on case studies researched and written by five civil society
organisations working in the Niger Delta, the report raises concerns
about Shell’s operations in relation to:
ECCR acknowledges that many of the problems in the Niger Delta are
the responsibility of the Nigerian government. But it argues that the
report’s ten concluding recommendations offer Shell and its operating
subsidiary SPDC immediate confidence-building measures (quick wins) as
well as longer-term ways to tackle some of the challenges they face.
‘The case studies in our report identify opportunities for Shell to do
things better in the Niger Delta,’ says ECCR Co-ordinator Miles
Litvinoff, who edited the report. ‘After years of unresolved community
tensions, Shell could reap benefits by making accountability to local
people a higher priority.’
Among the report’s most urgent recommendations are:
!
Longer term, the report calls for:
Senior Shell staff remuneration should be linked to progress on
human rights and environmental challenges in the Delta, ECCR says.
Citing the increasingly recognised corporate duty to respect human
rights by `doing no harm’, the report argues that Shell has both
responsibility and opportunity to improve its operational practices in
Nigeria.
Notes for editors
Case study contributors:
Boniface Dumpe, CSCR Port Harcourt:
+234 (0)84 573109 / 468555,
E. dumpe_bb@yahoo.com
Patrick Ereba, CSCR Port Harcourt:
+234 (0)84 573109 / 468555,
E. patrickereba@yahoo.co.uk
Joseph Croft, SDN:
+44 (0)20 7065 0846,
+44 (0)7966 755751,
E. joseph@stakeholderdemocracy.org
